In the tense days following the U.S. drone strike that killed Iranian Gen. Qasem Soleimani on Jan. 3, 2020, Iran responded with missile barrages on American bases in Iraq, injuring scores of people but deliberately avoiding fatalities. Tehran promised “harsh retaliation,” but no attacks struck U.S. soil. The reason wasnt deterrence alone or diplomatic restraint but something simpler: Iran lacked operational assets .
At the time, the regime had only scattered sympathizers, not embedded networks capable of executing homeland strikes. U.S. intelligence assessments after the strike highlighted threats abroad but noted no credible, specific domestic dangers because Irans reach stopped short of American borders.
Secure frontiers and rigorous vetting under the Trump administration ensured that potential operatives couldnt infiltrate U.S. defenses easily. Encounters with Iranians at the U.S. southern border averaged less than 20 annually from 2000 to 2019. The homeland remained insulated from the threat of terrorism from Iran.
Now, in March 2026, as U.S. and Israeli forces destroy Irans nuclear sites and tyrannical leadership in Operation Epic Fury â killing Supreme Leader Ayatollah and sparking regional responses â the calculus has shifted perilously. Iran has fired missiles on U.S. outposts in Bahrain, Saudi Arabia and beyond.
But the gravest risk simmers within the United States: potential activation of sleeper cells or lone actors on American soil. This vulnerability stems directly from four years of open-borders policies under President , who flung doors wide open to unchecked immigration, swelling Irans pool of sympathizers in the United States and possibly embedding assets at the regimes behest.
After the Soleimani strike, Irans plots against the U.S. homeland were aspirational at best. The regime planned assassinations of U.S. officials, including President and former National Security Advisor John Bolton, as revenge for the generals death. Yet these fizzled under vigilant counterterrorism efforts and gained no operational foothold in the United States.
Department of Homeland Security (DHS) bulletins warned of Irans intentions to use proxies such as Hezbollah, but emphasized its lack of immediate capability to carry out domestic attacks. ; Trumps “maximum pressure” sanctions and law-based immigration enforcement choked infiltration routes. Iranian-backed networks lurked in South Americas tri-border area, but U.S. enforcement cut off their northward paths.
invited chaos. Starting on Inauguration Day, he dismantled the border wall, axed the very successful “Remain in Mexico” policy, and allowed catch-and-release numbers to balloon. Over 10 million encounters with illegal immigrants followed, including surges from terrorism-prone nations. Apprehensions of Iranians skyrocketed: Border Patrol arrested 1,504 Iranian nationals from fiscal year 2021 to 2024âa twentyfivefold leap from the two prior decades.
Alarmingly, 729 of them were released into the United States, often after scant vetting amid overwhelmed systems. This wasnt mere oversight; policies such as expanded asylum loopholes and effectively welcomed risks. In June 2025, ICE rounded up 11 Iranians illegally present in the country, including a former army sniper, a Revolutionary Guard member, and a Hezbollah affiliate â all of whom had slipped in during Bidens tenure. Intelligence flagged 35 more Iranians plotting cartel-aided crossings that same month.
These entrants expanded Irans base of sympathizers and potentially provided support for assets of the Iranian regime. Border Czar decried the fueling of “sleeper cells,” a sentiment echoed in DHS alerts about Irans use of proxies amid escalating conflicts. Bidens approach to immigration didnt just strain resources; it extended an invitation to adversaries. As one national security expert put it, U.S. borders became a “sieve” through which global threats could
